Шаблоны LeoTheme для Joomla.
GavickPro Joomla шаблоны

Research article

Sequence-Based Typing for Legionella Pneumophila Isolated from Water Systems of Residential Facilities in Kuwait

Qadreyah Al-Matawah*1, Sameer Al-Zenki1, Søren Uldum2

1Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Environment and Life Sciences Research Center
2Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen Denmark

*Corresponding author Dr. Qadreyah Al-Matawah, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Environment and Life Sciences Research Center, P.O. Box 24885 Safat, 13109 Kuwait, Fax: 0096524956659; Tel. 0096524989116; Email: qmutawa@kisr.edu.kw

Submitted: 02-21-2016 Accepted:  05-23-2016 Published: 06-09-2016

Download PDF

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Article

 

Abstract

A total number of 30 strains of Legionella pneumophila (sg1 = 6; sg3 = 20; sg4 = 1 sg7 = 1; sg10 = 2) were genotyped by the SBT method according to the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Legionella Infections (ESGLI formerly EWGLI). A high proportion of isolates did not give a full 7 loci SBT profile due to amplification fail of the flaAA loci, the flaAA sequence of representative isolates were however revealed by whole genome sequencing. The Legionella pneumophila isolates were grouped into seven distinct Sequence Types, including one (ST1719) which were new to the SBT database of ESGLI and two (ST1223 and ST1718) which were recently also isolated from cooling towers in Kuwait but not have been reported from other countries.

SBT profile F, 14,16,25,7,13,24 (probably all ST336) (11 isolates of sg3) was the most prevalent genotype. The other prevalent STs identified were ST93 (nine isolates of sg3) and ST1 (five isolates of sg1). All of the ST1 sergroup1 isolates were of the Oxford/ OLDA subgroup. This is the first study used to describe the use of SBT to characterize environmental Legionella pneumophila strains isolated from domestic water systems in Kuwait. This baseline data will form the basis for the development of a Legionella environmental surveillance program to be used for future epidemiological investigations.

Keywords: Legionaires’ Disease; Legionella ; Serogroups; SBT; ST Profile; Water Contamination; Kuwait

Introduction:

Legionella pneumophila is a waterborne organism that has been increasingly recognized as the causative agent behind community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia in humans. Potable water systems have often been implicated as the source in the outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease [1,2]. Legionella spp. are Gram-negative bacteria that normally occupy natural aquatic environments where they can survive as intracellular parasites of protozoa. The majority of the community- acquired cases are caused by strains belonging to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 [3,4].

Molecular-based typing methods have often been used to characterize clinical and environmental Legionella pneumophila to determine the source of infection [5,6,7]. Sequence-based typing (SBT) is a highly discriminatory typing method for Legionella pnuemophila. Sequence-based typing using the seven gene locus (flaAA, pilE, asd, mip, mompS, proA, and neuA or neuAh) will result in a distinctive allelic profiling of the isolates which are then differentiated into sequence types (ST) [5,8,9]. The ESGLI SBT scheme is presently recognized as the ‘gold standard’ tool for Legionella pneumophila typing [5,8,10].

Only two study reports the characterization of Legionella that has been isolated from potable water systems in Kuwait [11,12]. However, no DNA Sequence Based Typing (SBT) has ever been determined for legionellae that has been isolated from Kuwait’s potable water and compared with the ESGLI database. In this study, we investigated SBT as a molecular tool to characterize 30 Legionella pneumophila isolates from domestic water systems in Kuwait. The allelic profiles of these isolates were then compared to the EWGLI database. This data will provide a better understanding of the dominant genotype( s) present in Kuwait’s environment.

Material and Methods

Legionella pneumophila

A total number of 30 environmental isolates of L. pneumophila were used in this study. These isolates have previously been isolated from domestic water system samples obtained from the faucets of wash basins and showerheads in bathrooms, taps from kitchens and cold and/or hot water tanks from seventeen different residential sites in Kuwait (Figure. 1)[12]. L. pneumophila was isolated on buffered charcoal yeast extract medium using standard methods AS/NZS 3896 [13].

Sero- and Subgrouping of Legionella pneumophila

The Oxoid Legionella Latex test was used to identify and differentiate between serogroup 1 and serogroups 2-14 (code DR0800; Oxoid; UK). The isolates were serogrouped and subgrouped if applicable using the Dresden panel of monoclonal antibodies as previously described [3,14].

Sequence Based Typing (SBT)

The genomic DNA was extracted from study isolates using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen). L. pneumophila isolates were genotyped using the seven gene protocol sequence-based typing (SBT) scheme developed by ESGLI as previously described [5,8]. Trace files with the obtained sequences were analyzed by using the Legionella SBT quality tool (http://www.hpa-bioinformatics. org.uk/cgi-bin/legionella/sbt/seq_assemble_legionella1. cgi). New alleles and STs encountered for the first time in this study were submitted to the database (http://  www.hpa.bioinformatics.org.uk/legionella/legionella_sbt/ php/sbt_homepage.php).

envsci fig 16.1

Figure 1. Sample collection sites. Red stars: positive sites for legionella. Site 1: Residential complex; site 2: Governmental building.

Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS)

The genomic DNA was extracted from four representative isolates using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen) and was subjected to whole genome sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform with 250bp paired-end reads according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The flaAA loci were extracted from the de novo assemblies (CLC-bio vers. 8.0). Four isolates were selected among isolates that failed to give a flaAA PCR product and showed one of the following four allelic profiles (1) F,14,16,16,15,13,2; (2) F,14,16,25,7,13,24; (3) F,14,16,65,7,13,217 or (4) F,14,16,19,15,13,215.

Cluster Analysis

A cluster analysis of the seven different Sequence Types found in this study was performed with BioNumerics v7.6 (Applied Maths), with the following settings Pearson correlation and the UPGMA method. The analysis was based on the sequences for the six loci flaAA, pilE, asd, mip, mompS and proA. Sequences of the seventh loci neuA in the standard SBT scheme could not be revealed for all isolates (ST1223, ST1718, ST1719 and ST1300) and was not included in the analysis (for these isolates neuA homologue (neuAh) sequences could be revealed, and in this way the isolates could be allocated to a definite Sequence Type). The sequences for the type strains Philadelphia- 1 (Legionella pneumophila pneumophila , serogroup 1, ST36) and Dallas-1E (Legionella pneumophila fraseri, serogroup 5, ST1300) were also included in the analysis.

Results

Sero- and Subgrouping of Legionella pneumophila

Two thirds of the L. pneumophila isolates belonged to sg3 (20 isolates) followed by sg1 (6 isolates). Sergroups 4, 7 and 10 were isolated at a lower frequency (1-2 isolates) as shown in Table 1. All of the six L. pneumophila sg1 isolates were of the Oxford/OLDA subgroup, and the sg4 isolate were of the Los Angeles subgroup as shown in Table 1.

envsci_table_16.1

Table 1. Sequence types among the 30 environmental strains of Legionella pneumophila isolated in Kuwait. *Isolates only reported from Kuwait

# flaAA was not revealed for these 10 isolates but the SBT profile was identical to ST336 for six of the seven loci and was also serotyped as serogroup 3 as the ST336 isolate, so it is most likely that the seven isolates also belongs to ST336.

Sequence Based Typing (SBT) & Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) 

Fourteen of the isolates failed to give a flaAA PCR product using the standard SBT protocol. In order to reveal the sequence of the flaAA genes and subsequently to allocate a full allelic profile and ST to the isolates, representatives for the different SBT profiles with flaAA fails (n = 4) were subjected to WGS. The WGS of the four representatives revealed that all four strains were flaAA allele type 11. The reason to the fail was found in the primer binding sites, which showed two and four mismatches in the forward and reverse primer binding sites respectively. Recently the same mismatches have been revealed in other flaAA PCR negative isolates form Denmark, UK and Israel [15]. Eleven isolates had the allelic profile F,14,16,25,7,13,24 but only one of these isolates were subjected to WGS, revealing flaAA allele type 11 and ST336. It is however very likely that all the other 10 isolates with this profile also had flaAA allele type 11 and belonged to ST336. The SBT results of the 30 L. pneumophila isolates are shown in Table 1. The isolates were distinguished into seven different STs of which one ST, ST1719, were identified for the first time and were submitted to the ESGLI SBT database. ST1223 and ST1718 were recently reported as new STs isolated from cooling tower water in Kuwait [16]. With the exceptions for the sg1 ST154, the majority of L. pneumophila sg1 isolates belonged to ST1 (1, 4, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1) which accounted for 20% of the total isolates. Two STs was observed for the L. penumophila sg3 isolates, ST336 (probably 11 isolates) and ST93 (nine isolates).

Many of the isolates (n = 14; of sg 1, 3, 4 and 7) seem to be rather closely related as they all share the same three alleles for pilE (14), asd (16) and proA (13) and probably also share the same allele for flaAA (11), but the latter was only documenter for four of the isolates. This profile is also recognized for the reference strains of serogroup 4 (Los Angeles-1; ST1334 (11, 14, 16, 25, 7,13, 206)), serogroup 5 (Dallas-1E; ST1300 (11, 14, 16, 18, 15, 13, 201)) and for the Lansing3 strain ST336 (11, 14, 16, 25, 7, 13, 24)); which, all have been suggested as belonging to the subspecies fraseri of L. pneumophila [17]. A cluster analysis of the seven isolates showed that the seven STs cluster in two different groups (Figure 2), one together with the Philadelphia-1 strain (subspecies pneumophila ) (ST1, ST93 and ST1223) and the others (ST154, ST336 and ST 1718) with the above mentioned common alleles cluster together with the Dallas 1E strain (subspecies fraseri). The clustering is independent of the serogroup distribution.

envsci_fig_16.2

Figure 2. Cluster analysis showing the relative similarity for the seven different Sequence Types of L. pneumophila isolated from domestic water systems in Kuwait based on the sequences for the six loci flaAA, pilE, asd, mip, mompS and proA. The sequences for the type strains Philadelphia-1 (Legionella pneumophila pneumophila , serogroup 1, ST36) and Dallas-1E (Legionella pneumophila fraseri, serogroup 5, ST1300) are also included in the analysis. Different colours represent different serogroups.

Discussion

This is the first study that provides a sequence-based typing for environmental L. pneumophila that is isolated from domestic water systems in Kuwait. This data also provides useful information for future epidemiological investigation of local and regional outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease. Our results are similar to those observed by Kozak et al. [18], who reported that 58% of the STs found were unique to the United States.

This study also reflects the distribution and profiles of Legionella genotypes circulating in Kuwait’s environment. Serogroup 3 isolates (77.1%) dominated the total number of isolates from the domestic water systems [12]. Moran-Gilad et al. [19] also reported similarly that the most prevalent environmental stain in Israel was sg3 (52%), but the results are different from the other studies that reported that sg1 was the most frequently detected environmental isolate [20,21]. Furthermore, Doleans et al. [22] and Harrison et al. [23] have reported that sg3 isolation rate in France and the UK and Wales were only 14.3% and 12.0%, respectively. The sg3 ST93 and SBT profile F/11,14,16,25,7,13,24 (probably all ST336) were the most prevalent STs circulating in Kuwait’s water systems accounting for 66,7% of all the isolates. ST93 has previously been implicated in a sporadic hospital case of Legionellosis [24]. In the ESGLI database ST93 is also recorded as a relatively common cause of community and nosocomial legionnaires´ disease and reported from several European countries and Japan. ST336 is on the other hand very rare, only one other strain of this ST has been submitted to the ESGLI database and this is a sg15 isolate (the Lansing-3 strain), so ST336 of serogroup 3 is for the moment unique for Kuwait. Little data is available on the virulence of sg3 isolates. Previous international survey studies have reported that L. pneumophila sg3 was responsible for only 1% of the outbreaks [4]. Serogroup 3 is however the second most common cause of legionnaires´ disease in Europe after sg1, but still only accounts for less than 5% of the culture confirmed cases [25]. The environmental predominance of sg3 with the allelic profile of ST93 and probably ST336 may suggest their ability to survive the harsh environmental conditions of Kuwait. Further studies will be needed to ascertain whether these predominant STs play a role in the transmission of community-acquired pneumonia.

Almost half of the isolates (n = 14) do share an allelic theme also seen in strains belonging to several members of the suggested subspecies fraseri of L. pneumophila . The reason to this high prevalence of strains with these common alleles for flaAA, pilE, asd and proA in Kuwait is unknown. It is however interesting that both ST336 and ST1718 also are widely distributed in cooling tower water in Kuwait [16].

The ST1 (1,4,3,1,1,1,1), the most frequent profile reported in the world, was found in all but one of six sg1 isolates (see Table1). This ST has been commonly isolated from environmental samples and is associated with outbreaks of legionnaires’ disease [26,27,28]. Notably, one sg1 subgroup Oxford/OLDA was ST154 which is a relatively rare ST. Furthermore, as all ofthe sg1 isolates belonged to the subgroup Oxford/OLDA they were negative for the MAb3/1 of the Dresden panel. MAb3/1 negative strains are common in the environment and Harrison et al. [23] reported that only 8.3% of the environmental L. pneumophila sg 1 isolates in the UK and Wales were MAb3/1 positive. In addition, MAb3/1 positive sg1 strains were implicated in 94% of legionellosis outbreaks in the United State [18] and can be considered as a virulence factor.

In conclusion, the data indicating that serogoroup 3 is predominant among environmental isolates of L. pneumophila from the domestic water systems in Kuwait, this observation might also be important for the selection of a diagnostic test for legionellosis in Kuwait. Urinary antigen test is the most popular diagnostic test worldwide, yet it can detect Lp serogroup 1 only, perhaps other diagnostic tests capable to detect sg3 (e.g. culture and PCR) should be recommended for Kuwait.

In addition, this study provides essential data on the prevailing ST isolated from domestic water systems in Kuwait. This baseline data may also be used in risk assessment and risk management strategies for water decontamination of infected water systems. Furthermore, since a comprehensive ST for clinical isolates is not available in Kuwait, it is clear that most of the STs with the exception of ST1 and to some degree ST93 not have been reported as major causes of Legionaires’ disease worldwide. The availability of clinical isolates may help in determining whether these isolates are responsible for future community acquired and nosocomial cases of legionnaires’ disease in Kuwait or not.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) for their kind funding and support for this project.

References

References

1.Garcia-Nuñez M, Sopena N, Ragull S, Pedro-Botet M, Morera J et al. Persistence of Legionella in hospital water supplies and nosocomial Legionnaires’ disease. FEMS Immunology Medical Microbiology. 2008, 52(2): 202-206.

2.Shands KN, Ho JL, Meyer RD, Gorman GW, Edelstein PH et al. Potable water as a source of Legionnaires’ disease. JAMA. 1985, 253(10): 1412-1416.

3.Helbig J, Bernander S, Castellani Pastoris M, Etienne J, Gaia V et al. Pan-European study on culture-proven Legionnaires’ disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2002, 21(10):710-716.

4.Yu VL, Plouffe JF, Pastoris MC, Stout JE, Schousboe M et al. Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community-acquired legionellosis: An international collaborative survey. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2002, 186(1): 127-128.

5.Gaia V, Fry NK, Afshar B, Lu¨ck PC, Meugnier H et al. Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila . Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2005, 43(5): 2047-2052.

6.Gilmour MW, Bernard K, Tracz DM, Olson AB, Corbett CR et al. Molecular typing of a Legionella pneumophila outbreak in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2007, 56(3): 336-341.

7.Le´vesque S, Plante P-L, Mendis N, Cantin P, Marchand G et al. Genomic Characterization of a Large Outbreak of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Strains in Quebec City, 2012. PLoS One. 2014, 9(8): e103852.

8.Ratzow S, Gaia V, Helbig JH, Fry NK, Luck PC. Addition of neuA, the gene encoding Nacylneuraminate cytidylyl transferase, increases the discriminatory ability of the consensus sequence-based scheme for typing Legionella pneumophila serogroup1 strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2007, 45(6): 1965-1968.

9.Mentasti M, Underwood A, Lück C, Kozak-Muiznieks NA, Harrison TG et al. Extension of the Legionella pneumophila sequence-based typing scheme to include strains carrying a variant of the N-acylneuraminate cytidylyl transferase gene. Clinical Microbiology Infection. 2014, 20(7): O435-441

10.Gaia V, Fry NK, Harrison TG, Peduzzi R. Sequence-based typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 offers the potential for true portability in legionellosis outbreak investigation. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003, 41: 2932-2939.

11.Qasem JA, Mustafa AS, Khan ZU. Legionella in clinical specimens and hospital water supply facilities: Molecular detection and genotyping of the isolates. Medical Principles Practice. 2008, 17(1): 49-55.

12.Al-Matawah QA, Al-Zenki SF, Qasem JA, Al-Waalan TE, Ben Haji AH. Detection and Quantification of Legionella pneumophila from water systems in Kuwait residential facilities. Journal of Pathogens. 2012.

13.AS/NZS 3896. Waters-examination for Legionella e. Standards Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia, 1998.

14.Helbig JH, Kurtz JB, Pastoris MC, Pelaz C, Luck PC. Antigenic lipopolysaccharide components of Legionella pneumophila recognized by monoclonal antibodies: Possibilities and limitations for division of the species into serogroups. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1997, 35: 2841-2845.

15.Harrison T, Moran-Gilad J, Mentasti M, David S, Afshar B et al. Use of whole genome sequence (WGS) data to investigate anomalies in the ESGLI Legionella pneumophila DNA-sequence based typing (SBT) method. Poster P-07, 2nd ESGLI Congress, Barcelona, Spain, 2014.

16.Al-Matawah Q, Al-Zenki S, Al-Azmi A, Al-Waalan T, Al-Salameen F . Legionella detection and subgrouping in water air-conditioning cooling tower systems in Kuwait. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015, 22(13): 10235- 10241.

17.Brenner DJ, Steigerwalt AG, Epple P, Bibb WF, McKinney RM et al. Legionella pneumophila serogroup Lansing 3 isolated from a patient with fatal pneumonia, and descriptions of L. pneumophila subsp. pneumophila subsp. nov., L. pneumophila subsp. fraseri subsp. nov., and L. pneumophila subsp. pascullei subsp. nov. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1988, 26(9): 1695-1703.

18.Kozak NA, Benson RF, Brown E, Alexander NT, Taylor TH Jr et al. Distribution of lag-1 alleles and sequence-based types among Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 clinical and environmental isolates in the United States. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009, 47(8): 2525-2535.

19.Moran-Gilad J, Mentasti M, Lazarovitch T, Huberman Z, Stocki T et al. ESCMID Study Group for Legionella Infections (ESGLI). Molecular epidemiology of Legionnaires’ disease in Israel. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2014, 20(7): 690- 696.

20.Kyung LH, Shim JI, Kim HE, Yu JY, Kang YH. Distribution of Legionella species from environmental water sources of public facilities and genetic diversity of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 in South Korea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010, 76(19): 6547-6554.

21.Rivera JM, Aguilar L, Granizo JJ, Vos-Arenilla A, Gimenez M J et al. Isolation of Legionella species/serogroups from water cooling systems compared with potable water systems in Spanish healthcare facilities. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2007, 67(4): 360-366.

22.Doleans A, Aurell H, Reyrolle M, Lina G, Freney J et al. Clinical and environmental distributions of Legionella strains in France are different. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004, 42(1): 458-460.

23.Harrison TG, Doshi N, Fry NK, Joseph, CA. Comparison of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophilia obtained in the UK over 19 years. Clinical Microbiology Infection. 2007, 13(1): 78-85.

24.Allerberger F. Molecular typing in public health laboratories from an academic indulgence to an infection control imperative. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2012, 45(1): 1-7.

25.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Legionnaires’ disease in Europe (2012) Stockholm: ECDC, 2014.

26.Amemura-Maekawa J, Kura F, Chang B, Watanabe H. Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from cooling towers in Japan form a distinct genetic cluster. Microbiology and Immunology. 2005, 49(12): 1027-1033.

27.Cazalet C, Jarraud S, Ghavi-Helm Y, Kunst F, Glaser P et al. Multi genome analysis identifies a worldwide distributed epidemic Legionella pneumophila clone that emerged within a highly diverse species. Genome Research. 2008, 18(3): 431- 441.

28.Harrison TG, Afshar B, Doshi N, Fry NK, Lee JV. Distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups, monoclonal antibody subgroups and DNA sequence types in recent clinical and environmental isolates from England and Wales (2000–2008). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009, 28(7): 781-791.

Cite this article:Qadreyah Al-Matawah. Sequence-Based Typing for Legionella Pneumophila Isolated from Water Systems of Residential Facilities in Kuwait. J J Environ Sci. 2016, 2(2): 016.

Contact Us:
9600 GREAT HILLS
TRAIL # 150 W
AUSTIN, TEXAS
78759 ( TRAVIS COUNTY)
E-mail : info@jacobspublishers.com
Phone : 512-400-0398